Legal Opinion · Dissent

James M. Sweeney v. Michael R. Pence

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 2, 2014No. 13-1264Published

1DissentWood, Chief Judge

Today’s decision is either incorrect or it lays bare an unconstitutional confiscation perpetuated by our current system of labor law. In my view, the better view is the former: the majority has simply misunderstood the federal statutory scheme, taken as a whole. The plain language of section 14(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not support such sweeping force for Indiana’s Right to Work law. Ind.Code § 22-6-6. No ruling of the Supreme Court has gone this far, and the legislative history of section 14(b) (for those who consider it relevant at all) is inconclusive. Even if,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API