Legal Opinion

In Re The Marriage Of: Daniel Valente, App/cr-respondent v. Fukiko Valente, Resp/cr-appellant

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 10, 2014No. 69242-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

i<v c<. opt i^i-? ifi Kr. V<J- 3i IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE In the Matter of the Marriage of No. 69242-9-1 DANIEL VALENTE, Appellant/Cross Respondent, and FUKIKO VALENTE, PUBLISHED OPINION Respondent/Cross Appellant. FILED: March 10, 2014 Verellen, J. — A trial court has broad discretion to award maintenance to address the medical needs of a spouse, but reserving jurisdiction to revisit maintenance if the disease worsens is problematic. When the trial court finds only that a spouse "may" incur future medical expenses and rehabilitation costs, it is an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API