In Re The Marriage Of: Daniel Valente, App/cr-respondent v. Fukiko Valente, Resp/cr-appellant
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
i<v c<. opt i^i-? ifi Kr. V<J- 3i IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE In the Matter of the Marriage of No. 69242-9-1 DANIEL VALENTE, Appellant/Cross Respondent, and FUKIKO VALENTE, PUBLISHED OPINION Respondent/Cross Appellant. FILED: March 10, 2014 Verellen, J. — A trial court has broad discretion to award maintenance to address the medical needs of a spouse, but reserving jurisdiction to revisit maintenance if the disease worsens is problematic. When the trial court finds only that a spouse "may" incur future medical expenses and rehabilitation costs, it is an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.