Bailey v. State

ON REHEARING.

April 30, 1924.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant insists that the evidence classifies his case as one requiring a charge on the law of circumstantial evidence. The question was properly raised, but in some way we overlooked it. Moore, the sheriff, while traveling upon a public road in an automobile, met appellant, who was traveling in a buggy. The sheriff was going north and appellant south. After having traveled about fifty or a hundred yards from where he met appellant the sheriff turned his ear, overtook appellant and examined his buggy but found therein no whisky. The sheriff then…