Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1934No. 24302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties will be designated as relator and defendants. It is the relator's contention that he and the county commissioners entered into a completed contract by the terms of which he was to receive the sum of eight thousand three hundred and thirty dollars ($8,330.00) for the land taken and for the damage to his improvements and to the residue of his property.

It is the defendants' contention that the steps taken by the parties were part of an appropriation proceeding and that the defendants, either under statutory or common law authority, abandoned it, as they had a right to do.

It will be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruns v. Hirt, Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Ach v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API