Legal Opinion

Alcatraz Masonic Hall Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1906No. Civ. No. 161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

The plaintiff entered into a contract -with one L. U. Grant, October 19, 1899, for the construction by the latter of a building upon its land at the agreed price ■of $16,300, and at the same time the said Grant as principal and the defendant as surety executed to the plaintiff a bond if indemnity in the sum of $4,075, conditioned that Grant .should faithfully perform the said contract and deliver the building to the plaintiff within the contract time for its completion, free from all liens, demands and claims, and should pay to the persons performing labor or furnishing materials for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beers v. WolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Bethune v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. Judah v. ZimmermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Eldridge v. FuhrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. O'Neal v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Congregational Church of Christ v. LowreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API