Legal Opinion

Warner v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 17, 1933No. 341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The parties to this proceeding stipulated that the controversy should be submitted to the Board of Tax Appeals on the pleadings. Subsequently an additional stipulation of facts was filed. According to these stipulations, it appears that the petitioner is the widow of I. De Ver Warner, who died a resident of Bridgeport, Conn., on January 11, 1913, leaving a will and codicils thereto, which, as duly probated, are attached to the petition in the present case. The provisions of the will pertinent to this controversy are as follows:

' “Fifth: I give and bequeath to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Burnet v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Warner v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert Hoe Estate Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API