Legal Opinion

Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Dunlap

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 1916No. 6657PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Custer County; J. W. Lawter, Judge. Action by Mrs. Harry Dunlap against the Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

This action was instituted by Mrs. Harry Dunlap, widow of Harry Dunlap, for the benefit of herself and minor children, to recover damages from the defendant arising from the alleged negligence of said defendant causing the death of the said Harry Dunlap. The parties hereto will be designated as in the trial court.

On July 13, 1913, the said Harry Dunlap was employed' by the defendant railway company as a boilermaker in its shops at Clinton, Okla.,' and at the time of his death was engaged in repairing a boiler. In this employment it was necessary for him to work-inside a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrazzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ClampittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Myers v. Portland Ry. Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Clanton v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BratcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API