Legal Opinion

Page v. State Marshal Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 1, 2008No. AC 27578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiff, David Page, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendant, the state marshal commission (commission). The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded, on the basis of the doctrine of sovereign immunity, that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain his action. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts, as found by the court in its memorandum of decision, are relevant to the resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. On February 1, 2005, the plaintiff, a state marshal, brought this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kim v. EmtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Page v. STATE MARSHALL COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Page v. State Marshal CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Spillane v. LamontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API