Legal Opinion

In re Gould

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 9, 1939No. 18332PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon objections to a discharge in bankruptcy based upon the following transaction.

Within twelve months of petition filed and after, letters from a creditor threatening an attachment, the bankrupt transferred his automobile to his father-in-law in satisfaction of a debt due for $600. The bankrupt and his transferee lived in the same house. After the' transfer, the bankrupt by consent used the car as before. The transferee, indeed, did not know how to drive.

At the hearing the bankrupt, with candor wholly commendable, testified that when…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In re Julius Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Hultman v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Feynman v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. In re BrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. In re MaherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murfreesboro Production Credit Ass'n v. Harris (In Re Harris)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
  2. Booth v. Booth (In Re Booth)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  3. In re LupoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API