In re Lupo
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
McNAMEE, District Judge.
The single issue presented in this review is whether the Referee erred in refusing to grant the bankrupt a discharge. The facts upon which the issue arises are:
Albert Franklin Lupo, doing business as the Lupo Company of Ashtabula, Ohio, filed his petition for an Arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S. C.A. § 701 et seq., on March 18, 1950. Thereafter, on April 13, 1950, with his consent, Lupo was adjudicated bankrupt. The petition was executed by the bankrupt on March 13, 1950, five days before it was filed. Theodore E. Warren of Ashtabula is the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sonny's, Inc. v. Davis (In re Davis)District Court, D. Maryland · 1980