Legal Opinion
Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1947No. 11266PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of the amended complaint. The judge presiding prepared and filed an opinion setting forth fully his reasons for the dismissal (D.C., 64 F.Supp. 265). The first paragraph thereof reading as follows: “This action comes before me on a motion to dismiss the amended complaint of certain sugar beet growers, who are seeking treble damages under the Anti-Trust Act, Secs. 1 to 7, 15 note, Title 15 U.S.C.A., from the defendant sugar refiner, alleging a conspiracy, the effect of which prevented the sale of sugar beets on a free and open competitive market.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Stauffer v. ExleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- American Crystal Sugar Co. v. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Stauffer v. ExleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950