Legal Opinion

Lundstrom, Inc. v. Nikkei Concerns, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 17, 1988No. 11403-8-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

Lundstrom, Inc., appeals a directed verdict in favor of Nikkei Concerns, Inc., in Lundstrom's action to recover a real estate broker's commission on a transfer of Nikkei's property to the Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority (Pierce Transit). The dispositive issue is whether the transaction was the equivalent of a condemnation. We hold that it was and affirm.

In May 1984, Nikkei appointed Lundstrom as its agent with the right to sell a parcel of land in Pierce County. In the exclusive listing agreement, which expired September 21, 1984, Nikkei agreed that:

[I]n the event a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Wilson v. Ross Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  5. Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, N. A. A. C. P., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Joe Corp. v. McIverSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Tfo Realty, Llc v. Phillip S. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API