Legal Opinion
Solway State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel v. School District No. 26
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1930No. 27,630PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff appealed from an adverse judgment entered after his motion for amended findings and conclusion of law had been denied.
The case has been here before. 170 Minn. 83, 212 N. W. 25. After the cause was remanded the answer was amended (as suggested in our former opinion) so as to present the new issue whether defendant was entitled to an equitable offset against the whole of plaintiff’s claim.
A corporation is chargeable with knowledge of facts known to its officers transacting its business. There is an exception to this rule when the particular officer representing the bank is himself…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lowndes v. City National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- First Nat. Bank of Blaine v. BlakeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1894
- Emerado Farmers Elevator Co. v. Farmers BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- State Bank of Morton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- First National Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 28Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Martin v. First Nat. Bank of Rush CityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
- School District No. 1 v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Peoples State Bank, by Peyton v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.