Bolz v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentSix, J.
This is a K.S.A. 40-3107 motor vehicle liability insurance policy interpretation case. The policy in question, issued under the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act (KAIRA), contained a nonassignability clause. The question is whether the nonassignability clause in the policy bars Dr. Bolz’ claim. I would answer “yes” and affirm the district court.
On July 26, 1997, Emerson signed an “Irrevocable Assignment, Lien and Authorization” on a preprinted Bolz Chiropractic form authorizing payment of her personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to Dr. Bolz. On August 6, 1997, Dr. Bolz forwarded…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Brenner v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Parrish Chiropractic Centers, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Professional Rehabilitation Associates v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Gerdes Ex Rel. Griffin Chiropractic ClinicCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.