Ehnes v. Nolan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Plaintiff, a creditor of one William E. Murphy, deceased, brings an action under section 170 of the Decedent Estate Law to recover from the legatees of a deceased legatee of the deceased debtor Murphy, to the extent of the assets received by defendants-legatees from the estate of their testator who previously, *103by way of legacy, received a portion of the deceased debtor’s estate.
Under section 170, an action may be maintained against “ the surviving husband or wife of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Platt v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. Wechsler EstateNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Colgan v. DunneNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Rogers v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Personeni v. . GoodaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of New York v. Nic Homes, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. DupuyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Ehnes v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954