Legal Opinion

Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. Dupuy

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.

The defendant Gladys de Polignac moves (1) for an order vacating the warrant of attachment and all levies thereunder (Civ. Prac. Act, § 948) unless plaintiffs consent to the dismissal as against her of the fifth cause of action stated in the second amended complaint, (2) for dismissal of the fifth cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 1) for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and (3) for an order striking out from the second amended complaint (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 103) portions of paragraphs 13 and 15. By separate motion she moves (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 103) to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Avery v. AveryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Import Chemical Co. v. Forster & Gregory, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Mendoza v. MendozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Mendoza v. MendozaNew York Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. WhiteheadNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. DupuyNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API