Legal Opinion

Milldrum v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1985No. 85-5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

By stipulation the only question in this case is one of law: Did Act 900 of 1975 prohibit the appellee, Travelers Indemnity, from inserting in a group disability insurance policy a clause providing that total disability benefits under the policy would be reduced by the amount of Social Security benefits received by the disabled employee? Ark. Stat. Ann. § 66-3709 (Repl. 1980). Our jurisdiction is under Rule 29(l)(c).

The unambiguous language of the statute itself unmistakably dictates a negative answer to the question at issue. Act 900 provides that no contract of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ronald D. Nichols v. Nancy Anderson, Canal Insurance Company, Garnishee-Appellee. Allstate Insurance Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. ToranSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Garrett v. American Fidelity Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Ronald D. Nichols v. Nancy Anderson, Canal Insurance Company, Garnishee-Appellee. Allstate Insurance Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API