Legal Opinion

McHugh v. Voyce

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1929No. Docket No. 6571Published

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

Four actions are involved in this appeal, three brought by Frank J. McHugh, a street contractor, against several property owners to foreclose certain street improvement liens created pursuant to the “1918 street improvement ordinance” of San Francisco, and one by said property owners against the same McHugh and members of the board of public works of San Francisco to cancel the assessments upon which the liens were based. In this latter action the said McHugh filed a cross-complaint similar to his complaints filed in the other three actions.

In all four actions the liens in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City Street Improvement Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bienfield v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Cooper v. ReardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API