Legal Opinion

Rozenberg v. Bacigalupo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, inter alia, in effect, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs have an easement by prescription over property owned by the defendants, and to enjoin the defendants from interfering with that easement, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.H.O.), dated June 25, 2004, as, after a nonjury trial, failed to declare that they have an easement by prescription over property owned by the defendants, and the defendants cross-appeal from so much of the same judgment as permanently enjoined them from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Borruso v. MorrealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Led Duke v. SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Fulgenzi v. RinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Klumpp v. FreundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API