Legal Opinion

McMillan v. State Farm Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1962No. Civ. 165PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

At the trial it was determined that plaintiff was not covered for major medical payments by a policy of insurance issued by the defendant. The superior court held that the insurance did not apply to the plaintiff, because at the time of her injury she was occupying an automobile of her husband not included in the definition of “owned automobile” contained in the policy.

The plaintiff alleges in her complaint the corporate organization of the defendant, State Farm Insurance Company; that it issued to plaintiff a policy of automobile liability insurance on a 1957 Ford automobile registered in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Sampson v. Century Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. National Auto. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Morton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Russell v. Bankers Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Eliopulos v. North River InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Nelson v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. O'DOAN v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Vaughn v. Atlantic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API