Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Merchants' Exp. & Transp. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 27, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty. Action for loss of cargo.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

At about 3:15 o’clock on the morning of July 13, 1900, the barge James Mackin sank at Brown’s dock, at Newark, N. J., on the Passaic river, and the damage to her cargo, delivered the previous evening, is the subject of this action, wherein the libelants charge that the injury was “due to, and occasioned by, the improper and unfit condition and unseaworthiness of” the barge. The answer denies unseaworthiness, and alleges that the loss “was the result of the barge James Mackin striking some unknown obstruction, or the swells or suction of passing vessels run at a high…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Assessors v. OsbornesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. The Northern BelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. The ComptaDistrict Court, D. California · 1877
  4. The VividDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. The Steel InventorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  3. The TransitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  4. Oregon Round Lumber Co. v. Portland & Asiatic S. S. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1908
  5. Braker v. F. W. Jarvis Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API