Legal Opinion

Larry v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1933No. 6 Div. 325PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The proceeding is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law to recover the compensation due the dependent wife and minor children of the employee in case of death of the employee. All the conditions entitling plaintiffs to compensation were found in their favor by the trial court upon agreed facts for the purposes of that trial; but compensation denied upon plea of the statute of limitations of one year. Code, § 7576.

The death of the employee, Steiner Larry, occurred April 9, 1928. This action was begun under Code, § 7578, on October 12, 1932.

The chief contention here is that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Ex Parte ClineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Ex Parte Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Ivey v. Railway Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cofer v. EnsorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Nicholson v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Board of Education of Choctaw County v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Shirley v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API