Legal Opinion

Nohrnberg v. Boley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1925Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

BUDGE, J.

Application for rehearing was made and granted in this cause. Briefs were filed by the respective parties and have been examined, together with a re-examination of the record.

Appellants Day and Moorman in their petition for rehearing urge that a finding in favor of appellant bank is a finding in their favor; that this court has misunderstood the testimony with regard to the deposit made by Day with the bank, and the soundness of the opinion with respect to the status of the farm labor claims is questioned.

We have not misunderstood the record; neither are we of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee LodgeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hill v. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hughes v. LansingOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gem State Lumber Co. v. WittyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Weeter Lumber Co. v. FalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API