Legal Opinion

Sneed v. Yarbrough

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1933No. 20772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, prosecutes herein his second appeal in the same ease from a second judgment in favor of defendant in error, defendant below, in the trial court. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The original action was commenced in the district court of Creek county, Okla., on March 30, 1922. Since it was instituted, two amended petitions have been filed. The second and last amended petition was filed in the trial court on the lltli day of September, 1928. This was after the opinion in this court dated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Warner v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Wade v. Hope & KillingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Tomlin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API