Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sears Roebuck Co. v. Roddewig

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1940No. 44997Published

1DissentHamilton, C. J.

(dissenting) — Being unable to concur in the majority opinion, T respectfully dissent.

The Iowa Use Tax Act, imposing a 2 percent tax upon the use of tangible personal property, was enacted by the general assembly of Iowa (chapter 198, 47th G. A.) at its forty-seventh session held in 1937, and is complementary to the Retail Sales Tax Act, imposing a 2 percent tax upon the gross receipts from sales at retail, (chapter 196, 47th G. A.) passed at the same session of the legislature. The Use Tax Act provides for exemption from the tax when the property has already been subjected to a tax on sales…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Osborn v. OzlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API