Legal Opinion
Limitless Worldwide, LLC v. Advocare International, LP
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 25, 2013No. Case No. 2:13-CV-40PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR A TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
TED STEWART, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant AdvoCare International, LP’s (“AdvoCare”) Motion and Memorandum in Support of Request for a TRO and Preliminary Injunction. AdvoCare seeks an or-, der restraining and enjoining Limitless Worldwide, LLC (“Limitless”) from using the word “Spark” in its products. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant AdvoCare owns a registered trademark in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Lane Capital Management, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Lane Capital Management, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sara Lee Corporation v. Kayser-Roth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Gte Corporation v. David R. Williams, D/B/A General TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Sally Beauty Company v. Beautyco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ariix LLC v. Nutonic CorporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- DP Creations v. Reborn Baby MartDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Lovesac Company, The v. www.lovesacs.comDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022