Legal Opinion
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Okla. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2007No. Civil Action 06-0519 (PLF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment and the motion of plaintiff Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma (“Cheyenne-Arapaho”) for a continuance to permit discovery under Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1
The facts giving rise to the instant litigation began more than 130 years ago, when President Ulysses S. Grant established the Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma Indian Reservation in Oklahoma. See Compl. ¶ 12; Mot. Ex. B (Exec. Order (Aug. 10,1869), reprinted in 1…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Baptist Memorial Hospital v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lopes v. Jetsetdc, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Donahue v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Baptist Memorial Hospital v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.