Legal Opinion

United States v. Salcido

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 17, 2002No. 99-2162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Jose Salcido (“Salcido”) appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in marijuana. Salcido claims that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel because his attorney allegedly labored under a conflict of interest. Salcido also claims that both the incarceration and supervised release portions of his sentence violate the rule established in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Finding no Sixth Amendment violation, we will affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence of incarceration.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API