Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Johns

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1926No. 20033. En BancPublished

1DissentAskben, J.

(dissenting)—I yield ready concurrence to that portion of the majority opinion which holds that this court has previously decided that the governor has power summarily to remove, without notice or a hearing, all state officers appointed by him not liable to impeachment (of which a regent of the state university is one), and that therefore the questions presented by relator, which seek to modify or change the law there announced, should be deemed to be settled. It is not wise to unsettle the law of the state nor the construction of its statutes.

But I find myself wholly unable to agree with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Wehe v. FrazierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Studebaker Bros. v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  4. O'Dowd v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API