Legal Opinion

In re Watson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Return to a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are fully-stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, J.

Abram E. Watson sued out a habeas corpus, directed to the sheriff of Rensselaer county, to inquire into the cause of his imprisonment. The sheriff produced the prisoner, and returned that he held him by virtue of a warrant, dated January 12, 1871, signed and sealed by the surrogate of Rensselaer county. The warrant recites an order made by said surrogate, July 6, 1870, that said Watson should be committed to the common jail of Rensselaer county, charged with the contempt mentioned in said order, till he should have paid the fine imposed upon him for his misconduct, amounting to $5,876.50,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Albany City Bank v. SchermerhornNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Seaman v. . DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Hosack v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. People ex rel. Hawley v. BennettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  5. People ex rel. Backus v. SpaldingNew York Court of Chancery · 1843

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State v. NathansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  3. Ex Parte CrenshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ex parte HeddenNevada Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API