Legal Opinion
United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-0961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
The government filed a complaint against defendant Honeywell International, Inc., alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, as well as a common law unjust enrichment claim in connection with the sale of Zylon body armor shields. The government moved to stay discovery pending resolution of partial summary judgment cross motions in two pending related cases— United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc., Civil Action No. 04-0280(RWR), and United States v. Toyobo Co. Ltd., Civil Action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sai v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Upmc McKeesportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022