Legal Opinion

(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 23, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01663Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2:19-cv-01663-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Charles Head (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights 18 action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and an action under

18 U.S.C. § 2520

(“§ 2520”) for 19 violations of

18 U.S.C. § 2511

(“Title III” or “Wiretap Act”) against the County of Sacramento 20 (the “County”) and Kenneth Shelton (“Shelton”) (collectively, “Defendants”).1 The matter was 21 referred to a United…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Donald Milton Orand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API