Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 2011No. Criminal No. 2001-0410Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED sTATEs oF AMERICA Crim. No. 01-410-01 (TFH) VS. NATHAN1EL THoMAs, Defendant. \/\./\/\y\y\./\./\y§/§/ Memorandum Opinion Pending before the Court are Mr. Thomas’s (i) Pro Se Motion to Correct Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 [Dkt. # 83] (the "Motion to Correct"), and (ii) Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

[Dkt. # 79] (the "W M$tiog"). After a careful review of the motions, the oppositions thereto, and the record of this case, the Court DENIES both motions for the reasons…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API