Legal Opinion · Dissent

International Union of Electrical v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 28, 1980No. 79-1654, 79-1864 and 79-2562Published

1DissentMarkey, Chief Judge

With all due respect, I dissent. Lacking willingness, expertise, and legal authority to engage in what I view as legislation, I am unable to join in affirming the board’s action in this case. That an employer can be held in violation of a duty to bargain, for refusing to supply information, when the information and the source of the request are entirely outside the collective bargaining process, is to me a result grotesque.1 I can find no basis in law for such result. Though courts are on occasion forced to “make” law, I cannot join in what appears to me an unnecessary exercise of that power.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API