Legal Opinion

Martin v. Momany

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1946No. 30034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This action was instituted for the purpose of reforming a written contract of lease. In the original cause, filed October 29, 1945, the plaintiffs were Eugene R. Martin and Grace E. Martin, his wife.

Defendants filed a demurrer on the ground that there was a misjoinder of parties defendant, and that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The record does not disclose whether the court passed upon the demurrer.

On the same date, an amended complaint was filed in which B. J. [G.] Schultz and Rose M. Schultz were made additional plaintiffs. The amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Marks v. Mike Scaler's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKelvie v. HackneyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Phillips v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API