Legal Opinion

Chery v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 12-12131-GAOPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

O’TOOLE, District Judge.

The magistrate judge to whom this matter was referred has recommended that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 24) and motion to strike (dkt. no. 34) be denied. The defendants have filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”).

The defendants’ six objections to the R & R are essentially reargument of the points made in support of their motions. Many of them simply insist on the defendants’ version of the facts. I agree with the magistrate judge’s disposition of those issues.

I also note that denial of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Noviello v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  2. Alston v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  3. Cherkaoui v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Ciolino v. Keystone Shipping Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  5. Kuc v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API