Noonan v. Bell
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Blackford Circuit Court; E. C. Vaughn, Judge. Action by William Noonan against George R. Bell and another for damages. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.
— This action was instituted by appellant to recover damages from appellees. The latter, by their respective counsel, severally demurred to the amended complaint for want of facts. After setting out the several demurrers mentioned, the record contains the following entry: “And the court, after being fully advised in the premises, sustains the separate demurrer of each defendant, to which ruling of the court the plaintiff at the time excepts.”
Each demurrer presented the question as to the sufficiency of the amended complaint as against the demurring defendant. The entry therefore involves two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Johnson v. McCullochIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Walter v. WalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Leyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Wilson v. WolferIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Southern Railway Co. v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Decatur v. McKeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.