Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Chawney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1997No. Docket 104957PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

We are required in this property dispute to determine whether the defendants violated recorded subdivision restrictions when they built their home in the Village of Beverly Hills, Oakland County, in 1991. We hold that there was no breach, and we thus reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the decision of the circuit court.

i

In 1967, a twelve-lot subdivision known as Lincoln Green was platted in the Village of Beverly Hills in Oakland County. A restriction agreement for the subdivision was duly filed by developer Gerald J. Shannon with the county Register of Deeds.

By 1974,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sampson v. KaufmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Conlin v. UptonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API