Legal Opinion
Develop Don't Destroy (Brooklyn), Inc. v. Empire State Development Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marcy S. Friedman, J.
Petitioners Develop Don’t Destroy (Brooklyn), Inc. (DDDB) and Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council, Inc. (PHNDC) move, under the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (CPLR 8601), for payment by respondent Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by petitioners in prosecuting these CPLR article 78 proceedings.1 The DDDB petitioner seeks $169,626 in fees (not including the fees associated with the instant motion). The PHNDC petitioner seeks $146,000 in fees and $7,900 in expenses.
Petiti…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Goldstein v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Schulz v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Schulz v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Schulz v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023