Americans for the Arts v. Ruth Lilly Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust 1 U/A January 18, 2002
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
The primary question presented by this appeal is whether National City Bank of Indiana (National City), as trustee of two charitable trusts created by Ruth Lilly's (Ruth) estate plan, was required to diversify the trust assets. Although as a general rule, trustees have a duty to diversify, the trust instrument may modify that duty by permitting the trustee to retain certain- or all-trust assets. Concluding that the relevant documents at issue herein sufficiently relieved National City of the duty to diversify the trust assets, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTS…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Estate of JanesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Shriner v. SheehanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST OF RAY D. POST (P-000817-2012, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018