Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Johnson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1905PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

Tbe defendants -were jointly indicted for conspiracy in substance as follows: That Kumalae, a member of tbe house of representatives and chairman of a special committee on the “Chinese Fund,” and Johnson, an attorney, conspired to defraud *747the Territory by falsely representing to the standing committee on accounts that Johnson had,been engaged as clerk of said special committee and had performed certain services for it and rendered a legal opinion to it and that by reason thereof there was due him from the Territory $312.50, and that through false…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. People v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McKeague v. TalbertHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. BaronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GrahamHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HashimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. CardusHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API