Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1997No. CF95-0539; CA A90706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270(1). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in a search of a car in which he was a passenger. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that defendant did not have a protected interest in the car or its contents and, therefore, that his constitutional rights were not violated by the search. We affirm.

Defendant was a passenger in a car that was involved in an accident. The driver and defendant were taken to a hospital. At the hospital, defendant gave a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API