State v. Tucker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270(1). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in a search of a car in which he was a passenger. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that defendant did not have a protected interest in the car or its contents and, therefore, that his constitutional rights were not violated by the search. We affirm.
Defendant was a passenger in a car that was involved in an accident. The driver and defendant were taken to a hospital. At the hospital, defendant gave a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998