Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1998No. CF95-0539; CA A90706PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our decision upholding the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of a car in which he had been a passenger. State v. Tucker, 151 Or App 775, 951 P2d 190 (1997). We grant the petition and adhere to our original opinion as modified herein.

To the facts detailed in our earlier opinion, we add the following information taken from testimony at the suppression hearing. Defendant had been a passenger in a car involved in a single-car accident. The car had rolled over, and the force of the collision had caused the car’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API