Legal Opinion

Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. Segura

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1995No. 94-0514PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

in which HIGHTOWER, HECHT, ENOCH and OWEN, Justices, join.

In this case, we decide whether the longstanding bar to indirect purchaser recovery in antitrust suits also bars indirect purchasers who primarily allege antitrust conduct, but who sue under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”). Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-17.63 (Vernon 1987). The court of *504appeals held that retail buyers of infant formula “staffed] causes of action for unconscionable price disparity and taking advantage of plaintiffs’ lack of capacity, knowledge, and experience to a grossly unfair…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ash v. Hack Branch Distributing Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  5. Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API