Ex Parte Kay
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
While it has sometimes been said that the state or the public is interested in every suit for divorce, and that courts in granting or denying divorces have regard for the public interest in a general sense (Spafford v. Spafford, 199 Ala. 300, 308, 74 So. 354, L. R. A. 1917D, 773; Fisher v. Fisher, 95 Md. 315, 52 A. 898, 93 Am. St. Rep. 334; 9 R. C. L. 409, § 208), yet, when a decree of divorce has been duly rendered by a court having jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties, it differs in no respect from other decrees and judgments. It is conclusive upon the parties, and equally…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Spafford v. SpaffordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Ingram v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Fisher v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hartigan v. HartiganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Hooke v. HookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Gabbert v. GabbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.