Legal Opinion

Liberty Commons Realty Trust v. Gurge

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 9, 1996No. 960024CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtToomey, J.

Plaintiffs (“Liberty” and “Wildwood”) filed a complaint requesting this court to review a decision by the Leominster Planning Board to approve a site plan. Defendant Leominster Materials Corporation (“LMC”) was named as a defendant in the instant complaint because LMC, as the original petitioner before the Planning Board for the site plan approval, is required by G.L.c. 40A, §17 to be joined as a party. LMC now moves for dismissal, alleging a lack of jurisdiction with respect to Wildwood and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted with respect to both Wildwood and Liberty.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Bell v. MazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spruce Pond Village Ass'n v. LaLiberteMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  2. Wankico River, Inc. v. Carver Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API