Legal Opinion

Rath v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1954No. 794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, P. J.

This action arose on appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission denying the plaintiff, Esther Rath, the right to participate in the Workmen’s Compensation Fund for the reason that her husband’s death was not próximately related to an injury sustained in the course of and arising out of his employment with the Hazel-Atlas Glass Company.

The issues having been joined by petition and answer, the cause came to trial before a duly impanelled and sworn jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor. The trial court sustained the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mary E. Marker v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Bishop v. GuthrieOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Picchetti v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Mary E. Marker v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API