Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hines

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943No. Docket No. 31, Calendar No. 42,317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is an action to enjoin defendants from operating a piggery on a farm located in Southfield township in Oakland county. The defendants are Clarence Heth, owner of the farm; Bashie Plybon, renter and operator of the farm; and George Hines, who lives on the farm, but who apparently is only involved herein because' he was engaged in collecting and transporting garbage to the farm. The plaintiffs are various owners of residential properties in Beverly Hills, a residential section of single homes ranging in price from $10,000 to $25,000 and located in the general vicinity of the Heth farm.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trowbridge v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Zadel v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Township of Kalamazoo v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Township of Kalamazoo v. Kalamazoo Garbage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  2. Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Ensign v. WallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kobs v. ZehnderMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Fortin v. VitaliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API