Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pearson v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 1985Published

1Dissent

Titone, J. P.

(dissenting). This is a proceeding brought pursuant to Family Court Act § 466 to enforce the support provisions incorporated, but not merged, in a New Hampshire divorce decree. The petitioner wife, Joan Pearson, appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Rockland County, which, in essence, granted her former husband’s application to vacate previously entered orders of support. The core question is whether the full faith and credit clause (US Const, art IV, § 1) bars New York from directing that a New York spouse continue to receive such support by virtue of a New Hampshire…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API