Legal Opinion
Cozmyk v. Prompt Recovery Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-00375PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendant Prompt Recovery Services, Inc.’s (“PRS”) Combined Civil Rule 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Docket 14]. For the reasons discussed below, the defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the defendant’s Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot.
I. Background
a. Facts
This case arises out of an alleged telephone call and voicemail message from PRS to Gary Cozmyk. (Compl. [Docket 1], ¶ 10.) The plaintiff claims that PRS left one message for him on his family…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Giarratano v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rush v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Zortman v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Mao v. Global Trust Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Miller v. MediCredit, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019